Today’s students are tomorrow’s workforce

BC’s post-secondary institutions are in a funding crisis. Without critical government investment, the next generation of healthcare workers, skilled tradespeople and early childhood educators won’t make it to our hospitals, worksites or classrooms.

Two skilled trades workers, with one missing

Post-secondary education plays a central role in shaping British Columbia’s workforce and economic resilience. Students are prepared to contribute, but affordability pressures and access gaps continue to limit participation.

The funding crisis is leading to major deficits, cuts to academic programming and student services, and widespread layoffs at all of BC’s public institutions.

Long-term outcomes depend on timely investment. When students are supported and institutions have stable funding, the province is better positioned to meet labour demands, retain talent, and strengthen regional economies.

Public expectations are clear: there is an opportunity now to address the funding crisis facing BC’s post-secondary system before the cost of inaction grows.

Group of health care workers, with half missing

British Columbians have spoken

90%

The cost of post-secondary is pushing students out. Over 90% of British Columbians say education should be more affordable. Rising tuition, housing, and supply costs are creating new barriers for students across the province.

87%

Where you live shouldn’t limit what you learn. 87% of British Columbians believe it is important to have post-secondary options beyond Vancouver and Victoria. Expanding access improves affordability and supports regional retention.

55%

of British Columbians agree the BC government is not doing enough to ensure all those who are qualified have a chance at pursuing college or university education.

*Based on a August 2024 Viewpoints Research survey of 1,000 Canadian residents living in British Columbia.

We Need Urgent Action to Protect Our Future

Here are our three key recommendations. Check out our Policy Brief for more information.

  • Full Recommendation

    Strengthen the Tuition Limit Policy to maintain the 2% cap on domestic fee increases, ensure that institutions do not increase fees beyond the prescribed limits in the form of new ancillary fees, or realigning existing ancillary fees.

    Decades of insufficient government funding have incentivised institutions to increase tuition and ancillary fees as much as possible–including, in many cases, creating new ancillary fees (effectively tuition fees by another name) to circumvent the Tuition Limit Policy.

    Consequently, tuition in BC has more than doubled since 2001, outpacing inflation by every possible measure. Throughout this period, the cost of obtaining an undergraduate degree has increased by over $15,000 in tuition fees alone. As evidenced in 2011, following the deregulation of domestic tuition fees, fee increases have a compounding negative effect on enrolment.

    At a time when financial pressures are likely to encourage a short-sighted continued reliance on tuition fees, maintaining the Tuition Limit Policy remains critical to ensuring post- secondary education remains within reach for British Columbians looking to skill, reskill and enter the workforce.

  • Full Recommendation

    Complete the Post-Secondary Funding Formula Review and implement a new funding model that provides long-term financial stability for institutions, accounts for inflation and does not rely on student fees as the primary source of revenue.

    Completing the Post-Secondary Funding Formula Review, including implementing a new funding model, will serve two crucial purposes. First, it offers an opportunity to address current challenges: when the government funds the post-secondary system in a stable, sustainable manner that is not tied to fluctuating enrolments and fees, institutions can better adapt to meet BC’s shifting workforce needs. An effective funding model will ensure equitable funding, build resiliency against global events and policy changes, and enable institutions to serve rural and Indigenous communities as well as urban areas. The review is now more relevant than ever; it will highlight how pre-existing problems, including the impact of decades of government divestment, are compounded by the fallout and decline in international student enrolment caused by recent federal policy changes. This positions the provincial government to advocate for appropriate federal action while also supporting post-secondary advocates to echo BC’s calls for support.

    Secondly, completing the funding review demonstrates commitment and transparency to stakeholders–including students–who have participated through written and oral submissions. The government should follow through on its pledge to release the What We Heard report and develop a funding model that fairly distributes resources, aligns provincial funding with British Columbians’ skills-training needs, and promotes student success by ensuring high-quality, affordable education with key student supports. These are ambitious goals; not ones to shy away from, but to meet head-on by demonstrating provincial leadership, through renewed investment in post-secondary education.

    Much has changed since the funding formula was created: colleges have become universities, labour market demands in BC are constantly changing, and the needs of rural and regional communities have shifted as well. It is imperative that our funding model equip institutions to succeed in meeting their educational mandates and in safeguarding our world-class post-secondary system.

  • Full Recommendation

    Restore provincial funding to BC’s public institutions to not less than 75% of institutional budgets.

    The only way to fix the negative effects of chronic underfunding and decades long divestment is to provide stable, annual provincial funding for institutions to rebuild what has been lost–and what is being cut in real time. Restoring funding to BC’s public institutions will ensure our post-secondary education system is resilient, adaptable and world renowned. Investing in BC’s post-secondary system will protect the future of young British Columbians, fuel local economies and reduce critical worker shortages in healthcare, trades and early childhood education. It is an investment the public will both supports and stands to benefit from.

We Can't Afford Not To

These are the costs of inaction in post-secondary education.

  • Post-secondary institutions are more than places of learning–they are vital economic anchors, especially in regional and rural communities. Funding shortfalls that lead to layoffs, programme cuts, or that threaten campus closures, have impacts that extend far beyond campus walls. In many BC communities, colleges and universities are among the largest employers. They provide stable, family-supporting jobs for faculty, staff and service workers. They also attract students who rent apartments, shop locally, and participate in community life. Crucially, these institutions enable young people and non-traditional learners–to pursue higher education without leaving their home communities, ensuring a home-grown workforce ready to meet local employment needs, and easing pressure on already overburdened urban centres.

    Thompson Rivers University, for example, contributes over $885 million annually to Kamloops’ economy and supports one in every ten jobs in the region. It also provides essential social value, allowing more students–especially those from rural and Indigenous communities–to earn undergraduate and graduate degrees without leaving the region.

    Now imagine the impact of reversing these benefits. Layoffs not only harm staff, but also the wider local economy. Shutting down a programme–or worse an entire campus–reduces opportunities for rural and regional residents while depriving local businesses of prospective skilled workers. In communities where post-secondary institutions serve as economic anchors, funding instability doesn’t just threaten the education system; it threatens the community itself.

  • BC is also failing to maximize its public post-secondary system to meet the province’s pressing need for skilled workers. The problem isn’t a lack of demand, rather, the system lacks the resources to respond effectively. Despite provincial goals to fill healthcare vacancies, accelerate housing construction, and expand early learning, institutions across the province are being forced to reduce seats, lay off faculty, and cancel or suspend programmes.

    The problem is structural. Provincial operating funding has not kept pace with enrolment growth or inflation, leaving institutions without the stable, long-term funding they need to maintain or grow key programmes. Simultaneously, rising tuition adds further strain and places a growing burden on students, who are paying more for fewer course offerings and increasingly strained services. Students attending the Justice Institute of British Columbia (JIBC) report sessional instructors with limited experience and the re-use of lab equipment as cost-saving measures–visible signs of the erosion of education quality tied to chronic underfunding.

    Without decisive action to restore stable public funding, BC risks losing its capacity to train the next generation of workers–further exacerbating critical labour shortages in healthcare, skilled trades, and beyond.

    Today, we have a post-secondary system unable to deliver on workforce development on the scale required. Over the next decade, 76% of the more then 847,200 job openings expected in the province will require some level of post- secondary education or training, yet the funding needed to rescue an education system in crisis is not being prioritized. Instead of expanding capacity to meet workforce demand, institutions are closing programmes directly tied to sectors experiencing worker shortages.

    Nowhere is this contradiction more clear than in the case of Okanagan College’s two-year Bachelor of Nursing. The case study below shows how a high-demand programme serving a critical sector was eliminated without warning, leaving students, staff, and the healthcare system scrambling amidst the loss.

  • The 2023 closure of Okanagan College’s two-year Bachelor of Nursing programme reveals how administrative decision-making can be disconnected from both student and workforce needs. In 2022, the province announced 602 new nursing seats across BC. The BC Nurses Union applauded the announcement, citing year-long waitlists for nursing programmes and applicant volumes that far exceeded available spots. Yet only one year later, Okanagan College (OC) abruptly shuttered its nursing programme.

    Students and faculty were blindsided. There were no plans in place to transfer bursaries or financial aid tied to students’ enrollment at OC, nor any support for the higher tuition costs at UBC-Okanagan, where students were expected to finish their studies. Despite a national shortage of nursing educators, no strategy was implemented to retain experienced instructors within BC’s public post-secondary system.

    Summing up the confusion, the Okanagan College Faculty Association stated “at a time when the province is recommitted to filling nursing vacancies and guaranteeing nurse to patient ratios coming out of the pandemic it is puzzling why our college would lose this programme.”

    This is not an isolated case. There are countless other examples across the province of class and programme closures made with little regard for student needs (small class size, regional location, lower tuition fees, etc.) that also appear to contradict the province’s economic needs. Each short-sighted cut compounds already urgent labour market shortages.

  • British Columbia’s post-secondary system is in crisis–not from a lack of demand or potential but from decades of chronic underfunding and short- sighted policy decisions that prioritize short-term revenue over long-term stability.

    The consequences of BC’s unstable post- secondary funding model are clear: campuses are losing essential programmes; instructors and staff are being laid off. Students, both domestic and international, are paying more for less, and regions that depend on local colleges and universities are being left behind.

    Government divestment has left institutions dangerously dependent on international student tuition–a volatile and unreliable funding source vulnerable to global events and policy changes. The COVID-19 pandemic and the federal government’s recent study permit caps have exposed just how fragile our province has allowed its post-secondary system to become.

    These impacts are no longer hypothetical warnings; they are unfolding in real time: delayed graduations, fewer student services, economic strain on communities where institutions are major employers, and an education system falling short of meeting BC’s urgent labour needs.

    The province now faces a choice: continue on this unsustainable path and watch one of our greatest provincial assets deteriorate further or reinvest boldly in post-secondary education. We must move beyond band-aid solutions and rebuild a system that is accessible, resilient, and prepared to train tomorrow’s workforce–one that balances the social, economic, and academic benefits to British Columbians with the workforce outcomes our labour market demands.

    The cost of inaction is too high. The time to act is now.

BC’s post-secondary students are ready to be part of the solution.

They’re prepared to work alongside government to build a strong economy and join the workforce, but we need to invest in post-secondary to set them up for what’s next.

Are you a policymaker interested in supporting BC's post-secondary students?

Contact Us

Jill Adams, BCFS Organiser

Email: [email protected] | Phone: (604) 733-1880


Resources for Policymakers

Download our Policy Brief


Spread the Word

Share